Renaissance drama or modern American fiction. You may even have a subject, such as Shakespeare and the classics or Faulkner and rural Mississippi. But you are still lacking something crucial. Zwicker, Stanley Elkin Professor in the Humanities. "What questions do you want to ask? What kinds of evidence will supply the answers? What archives should you be planning to visit?" Eliot Smith Professor of History, are teaching a monthly seminar at the Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington, D.C., to help doctoral students in history and literature learn more about problem-based research. They are focus- ing on an area familiar to both of them: the vast array of materials available for the study of early modern Britain. particularly the intersection of politics and literature. Hirst is an expert on early modern British history, showing how cultural and social issues have shaped historical events. With such similar interests, Zwicker and Hirst have collaborated in the classroom and in writing projects, currently on a study of Andrew Marvell and his work. writer's failure to take a problem- solving approach. "We ought to be able to answer the question: `Why should I be interested in this?' That is a question I don't think is asked often enough, but it seems to me very important to be here has to do with economics and culture or race and gender or issues of identity.'" has dealt with a number of key questions: How did men and women in the Renaissance view love, desire, selfhood or identity? Did they think differently about these categories than we do? How did their religious beliefs or notions of the body shape their attitudes? the seminar, which is sponsored by the Folger Institute, the educational division of the Folger library. They travel to the Folger once a month for research and for the Friday afternoon seminar. including Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, Harvard, Yale, the University of Pennsylvania, Rutgers, Boston University and the University of Maryland. All of them are writing dissertations in the early modern field; their subjects cover a variety of topics, from travel narrative to the nature of numbers and astronomy; from conceptions of childhood to heroic figures in drama. which provoked a spirited response. Some of the students asked how we can know what people in the early modern period thought of their texts; one answer is "marginalia," the notes that readers left in the margins. But people often read out loud during this period -- so perhaps their reactions were also influenced by the responses of the listeners or by the act of reading the text? evidence of acts and performances that have disappeared, like the act of reading?" says Zwicker. institutions and use the lessons they learned while formulating issues in their disserta- tions and in their teaching. They also want students to consider the interdisciplinary character of much early modern scholarship: Do colleagues in history, political thought or history of science share some of these concerns? How can their questions and problems shape work in allied fields? revolution that is powerfully changing the ways in which we read, our access to research materials and the kinds of intellectual problems that interest us now and will remain important in the future. your work accessible and exciting -- and not just to a few scholars who work in exactly the same field of research," he says. "We must engage people: in the academic community, in the intellectual community and readers more generally." |